Talk:Garima Gospels

Bible Low‑importance

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Oriental Orthodoxy Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oriental Orthodoxy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on the Oriental Orthodox Church on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Oriental OrthodoxyWikipedia:WikiProject Oriental OrthodoxyTemplate:WikiProject Oriental OrthodoxyOriental Orthodoxy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Africa: Ethiopia Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ethiopia portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ethiopia.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

A fact from Garima Gospels appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 July 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Ethiopian Garima Gospels (pictured) was redated by radiocarbon testing to between 330 and 650, making it one of the oldest illuminated Christian manuscripts in the world?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/July.

Wikipedia

Oxford Conference November 2013

a report and resume of the conference proceedings is published here: http://www.ethiopianheritagefund.org/Ethiopia%20and%20the%20Mediterranean%20World%20in%20Late%20Antiquity-%20bausi%20review.pdf

Conference programme is here: http://www.ethiopianheritagefund.org/conference.html

In my view this is sufficient academic publication for a rewrite of the article on the lines of Prof. Bausi's resume. "The dating of Abbā Garimā 2 in particular would also make it the most ancient Christian manuscript decorated with paintings, even older than the famous Rabbula Four Gospels book of the Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana of Firenze" TomHennell (talk) 17:39, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The fellow apparently never heard about the Codex Alexandrinus, Codex Washingtonianus, and a bunch of other MSS. "The period between 390 and 660" is a pretty wide span. --Ghirla^-трёп- 11:38, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The wide range is caused by combining two ranges, one for each manuscript. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.144.71.8 (talk) 12:06, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose the argument would be that the Codex Washingtonianus is not itself illustrated; rather it is the covers that are painted. While the Codex Alexandrinus has decorative tailpieces rather than full-page miniatures. A more precise counter-example might be the Cotton Genesis - if this is assumed to be a Christian manuscript. But the statement in the article is simply a quote from the source. TomHennell (talk) 12:14, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Garima Gospels. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120501030359/http://ethiopianheritagefund.org/artsNewspaper.html to http://ethiopianheritagefund.org/artsNewspaper.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:27, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gärima

If "Gärima" is the correct spelling, then both this page and Abba Garima Monastery should be re-titled (or at least have a note added). Placing a few diaereses in the article without explanation just confuses the reader. Srnec (talk) 02:17, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]